Showing posts with label kid gloves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kid gloves. Show all posts

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Dirty Political Campaigning, Barack Obama Style

Why is the media so completely hands off on Barack Obama? Is it their intent to wait until he has the Democratic nomination and then sit back and watch the Republicans rip him to shreds? Where is the real media coverage of this man worthy of a news corp who should be investigating and picking apart a presidential candidate, especially one so unknown to the general public until recently?

Today on ABC with George Stephanopoulos-

STEPHANOPOULOS: Your hometown paper, The Chicago Tribune, endorsed John McCain today. And had some kind words for you as well. But they went on to talk about your relationship with the real estate developer now indicted Tony Rezko. And they wrote this in their editorial. "Obama's assertion in network tv interviews last week that nobody had indications Rezko was engaging in wrongdoing strains credulity. Tribune stories linked Rezko to questionable fund-raising for Governor Rod Blagojevich in 2004. More than a year before the adjacent home and property purchases by the Obamas and the Rezkos. One more time, senator, you need to divulge all there is to know about that relationship." ... (source: ABC's "This Week" - rough transcript)
_________________________________________________

If invoking MLK's name in a campaign stump isn't playing the race card to some of you, tell me what other candidates would dare to use this? If commenting on someone's ability to dance (to see if they are a soul brother) isn't invoking the race card, tell me what other candidate would dare to use such a comment in a nationally televised debate?

Who's injecting race into the campaign? click to read more

Rev. Caldwell's Homophobic Mission Statement Disappears
- per Taylor Marsh's blog

Barack Obama being endorsed by one of George W. Bush's spiritual advisers wasn't exactly news to me. I wasn't even going to post on it, especially since Obama isn't exactly running as a devout Democrat. Besides, regardless of Obama's endless talk, he doesn't have any problem whatsoever in embracing homophobics. Donnie McClurkin was exhibit A.
But this latest development is very interesting. Now Rev. Caldwell's ministry, after he endorsed Obama, has nuked the page everyone was linking to yesterday that outlines his church's mission statement, which trumpets homosexuality as something a person "seeking freedom" from "habitual sins" should seek out.
Thank heavens for Google cache:
Metanoia Ministry
We are pleased to announce the creation of “ The Way, The Truth and The Life”, a program created to provide Christ Centered instruction for those seeking freedom from homosexuality, lesbianism, prostitution, sex addiction and other habitual sins.
But the original page is now gone. Poof! Call rewrite - stat.
This is what Obama and his campaign does repeatedly. Hide the record in order to prop up his propaganda. Lucky for them the national press seems to be sleeping through it all. Matt Stoller has more.

________________________________________________

The Dirty campaign of Obama and his team

A spokesman for Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) presidential campaign sent out a memo Tuesday afternoon suggesting that rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) might violate her pledge not to campaign in Florida ahead of its Jan. 29 primary.

"...Clinton has scheduled a fundraiser in Florida for Jan. 27, and “there are signs – despite Senator Clinton’s public pledge to the contrary – that she may be planning to campaign in the state ..."

"The memo was to remind recipients that the results of Tuesday night’s Michigan primary, much like Florida, “have no bearing on the Democratic nomination contest..."

Facts: This attempt by the Obama campaign to downplay these states is for one reason only. No matter how you spin it, 1) these states have a huge delegate count and 2) Hillary has a comfortable lead in both states. It is for these reasons only that Obama is trying to downplay the importance of these states when he and his team know full well that these 2 states are very likely to be seated at the convention in Denver.

Facts: Obama, Hillary, Edwards and the others who were in the race all held fund raisers in Florida.

"Burton reiterated in the memo that Obama is “firm in his commitment” to refrain from campaigning in Florida"

"But this morning, first Mr. Edwards, then Mr. Obama, announced that they, too, would refuse to campaign in renegade states..."

Fact: Obama has been running a campaign ad on tv in Florida in the districts that are most important to his campaign.
A Florida reader writes that Obama's new spot is airing on cable down there, giving Florida Democrats a small window into a primary process that they can otherwise only learn about from, you know, the media

The Clinton campaign says Obama's breaking the pledge (which refers to a DNC definition of "campaigning" that doesn't make an exception for national buys)

Just last week the Obama campaign snubbed the people of Florida in a memo that stated that Florida did not matter in the nominating process. After consecutive losses in New Hampshire, Michigan and Nevada, they appear to be changing course.

He is complaining that he has no control over a national ad which isn't true. He also claims that SC gave him special permission to run ads in Fla (when they were one of 4 states who the promise was made to).

This is blatant twisting of the pledges and the voters out there must be made aware of this, that Obama is running as dirty a campaign as can be played.

___________________________________________________

"I worked in John and Ted Kennedy's campaigns. Barack Obama is no Kennedy. He is an inexperienced senator: long on lip, short on accomplishment. We elected a "likable" president seven years ago, and close to 70 percent of us live in daily regret and hardship for that monumental mistake. In a time when Iran threatens, AT&T and Countrywide falter and recession looms, Hillary Clinton alone manifests the experience and unmitigated toughness to see this country through the threats ahead.
Fran Natale Parente
Clark, N.J."

___________________________________________________

Obama Uses National Security to Damage Democratic Brand
In an interview, Barack Obama went out of his way to impugn the national security bona fides of a fellow Democrat. Presidential politics aside, this is scorched earth politics. It's also the most dangerous kind of ploy to play against one of our own. Obama obviously thinks he's playing a game, instead of launching a deadly charge against a Democratic party leader. I know Mr. Obama doesn't have any respect for history, but since the Vietnam war and Reagan walked in to Washington, this is the type of charge Republicans have been using against our party for decades. Obama's subtle way of sneaking it into the political bloodstream is the actions of someone who cares more about himself than what he does to the Democratic brand. Because if he seeks to sew doubts about a woman running for commander in chief, he's doing so at all of our peril. The fact that military men across a wide spectrum have endorsed Clinton is not a small matter. I'd like Obama to make this quiet charge in front of Wesley Clark or Joseph Wilson.

But this really is rich, coming from a guy who wouldn't even hold a hearing of his own foreign affairs committee. Ducks out on important votes so we don't know how he would have voted. Chooses to vote "present" on votes that require taking a stand. Won't tell the truth about his a lobbyist being involved in his own campaign. Runs untruthful ads about his health care plan saying it is "universal" when it is clearly not. Says he won't use outside groups, then when he gets desperate ignores a UNITE HERE ad in Nevada.

But the worst of it is that Obama is now using subtle tactics to insintuate that Clinton can't be trust with secret intelligence.

Then asked whether that means she can't be trusted to portray secret intelligence to the American people:


"I will decline to answer that question. I am making a point about politics. ... Part of the change that is needed in Washington, if there is enough trust between the American people and their officials, when there are difficult decisions to be made, there is not a lot of cynicism." ... ..
Obama: 'Making a point about politics'

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Why won't any of the media touch the real Obama details?

It doesn't matter if we are talking about his resume, drug use, voting record, avoidance of voting on critical issues, or voting "present" so many times instead of taking a stand voting up or down, even though it could hurt his political future.... Why won't the media analyze this arrogant man as to why he wrote so many books about himself at such a young age? Does this not speak volumes about this guy? How many people do that when they are still at the beginning of their adult years?

Where is the media coverage on Obama? Ok so we can't believe every video pronouncement like this on face value, fair enough.. but if this isn't true, why would this man show his face to make this video? Why hasn't Obama filed a complaint to remove it or sued the guy for defamation?



Obama Unmasked
Andrew Stephen
Published 10 January 2008

What's going wrong for the man who would be president? Our US editor Andrew Stephen reports from Washington. Plus Joe Treasure among California's Clinton lovers

We at the New Statesman must take some of the blame, I suppose. Barack Obama had been a senator for just ten months in 2005 when we devoted a cover to his face, anointing him as one of ten people likely to have an impact on the world. It was only during 2007, however, that the American media fell head-over-heels in love with Obama; when he trounced Hillary Clinton in the Democratic party caucuses in Iowa on 3 January, it seemed that the electorate was swooning in a headlong rush to the altar with Obama, too. By the end of the first week of the '08 presidential election year, the media had all but handed over the keys to the White House to him.
So it all came as a shock to the pundits and pollsters on the night of 8 January when, despite predictions of an overwhelming Obama triumph, it became clear that the voters of New Hampshire had given Hillary Clinton the victory over Obama she badly needed. The reason for the media's distortions, I believe, is that Obama's relationship with the press and the electorate is still at the stage of starry-eyed infatuation. Yes, he is a mesmerising political orator who offers a magic elixir that somehow contains both stimulants and sedatives: that we need not worry about the present or future, because we can look forward to a new dawn of hope and reassurance in the safe hands of President Obama. Exactly how and why this would happen is not clear, but it is heady and exciting stuff.
I suspect that the longer the relationship continues, however, the more Obama's many faults and shortcomings as a presidential candidate will emerge. In his speech admitting defeat in New Hampshire on Tuesday, for example, a hint of his bad-tempered haughtiness emerged. He is not the fresh-faced young idealist the media like to portray, but a hard-headed 46-year-old lawyer whose monumental drive and political calculations make the Clinton's seem like a pair of amateurs. The media and electorate may have fallen in love with him spontaneously, but Obama has been carefully plotting his strategy to seduce them for decades

Full article a must read here A little "blow"

Related- The NY Times has endorsed Hillary Clinton and John McCain. Note they didn't back home boy Rudy!
hit tracker